Re: Must be owner to truncate?
| От | Andrew - Supernews |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Must be owner to truncate? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | slrndcqufn.13l5.andrew+nonews@trinity.supernews.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Must be owner to truncate? (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Must be owner to truncate?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2005-07-07, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > >> * truncate is not MVCC-safe. > > Erm, that's why it gets a stronger lock, so I don't really see what > this has to do with it. It's not MVCC-safe even with the AccessExclusive lock; it damages snapshots that were taken before the truncate operation but which don't have a lock on the table yet. The only reason it doesn't break pg_dump is that the first thing that pg_dump does is to take AccessShare locks on every table that it's going to dump. -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: