Must be owner to truncate?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Must be owner to truncate?
Дата
Msg-id 20050707164050.GH24207@ns.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Must be owner to truncate?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Must be owner to truncate?  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Greetings,
 The current permissions checks for truncate seem to be excessive.  It requires that you're the owner of the relation
insteadof requiring that you have delete permissions on the relation.  It was pointed out that truncate doesn't call
triggersbut it seems like that would be something easy enough to check for.  My thinking is to replace the existing
ownercheckwith:
 
 Must have delete permissions on the relation If the relation has triggers:   Check that the caller is the owner of the
relation,if so, then   issue a NOTICE that those triggers won't be called and perform the   truncate.   If not the
owner,then error out saying there are ON DELETE triggers   and that you're not the owner.
 
 I can submit a patch for this today if there's general agreement on this change.  An alternative that was mentioned
wasto make 'delete' smart enough to know when it's delete'ing all the rows and there aren't any triggers on it, etc, to
performlike truncate, perhaps leaving the old file around until all transactions using it have finished.  This sounds
likea good idea but also sounds like it'd be a larger change and might have to wait till 8.2.
 
     Thanks,
    Stephen

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SQL99 - Nested Tables