Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
| От | PFC |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | opskezjlb7th1vuj@musicbox обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
> I'm curious, why do you think that's serious ? What do you really expect
Simply because I don't like VB non .NET, but C# is a much much better
language, and even VB.NET is decent.
> to do in the stored procedure ? Anything of consequence will seriously
> degrade performance if you select it in say a million rows.
Well, if such a thing needed to be done, like processing a lot of rows to
yield a small result set, it certainly should be done inside the server,
but as another poster said, being really careful about memory usage.
But, that was not my original idea ; I find that even for small functions
plsql is a bit ugly compared to the usual suspects like Python and others
; unfortunately I think there is overhead in converting the native
postgres datatype to their other language counterparts, which is why I did
not try them (yet).
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: