Re: implicit analyze on vacuum?
| От | Doug McNaught |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: implicit analyze on vacuum? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m3y9kvtwz0.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | implicit analyze on vacuum? (culley <culley@easystreet.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
culley <culley@easystreet.com> writes: > couple of questions about vacuum: > > If you run vacuum nightly does that mean you do not need to run vacuum > analyze? is analyze implicit? No. Running VACUUM ANALYZE will do everything needed, though (VACUUM is implicit in VACUUM ANALYZE). > I've set up a job to vacuum my databases nightly but the account > running the job doesn't have super-user permissions and it blows up on > all the pg_ tables. Is there any harm in transferring ownership of > these tables away from a super-user? It would be much better to run the VACUUM job as the PG superuser or an account with superuser privs. I would think changing perms on pg_* could lead to severe security holes. -Doug -- Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees. --T. J. Jackson, 1863
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: