Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> ... in other words, it doesn't require the double quotes. I don't see
> the value of being more restrictive. Why is this annoying?
Note also that using iso-8859-1 is not more restrictive, but just the
opposite. Using iso-8859-1 will be useful also for English users since
some words in use in the English language use characters not in the
ASCII encoding, resumé for instance.
Regards,
Manuel.