Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Oh, I thought part of the objective here was to try to centralize that
> stuff. If we're assuming that slaves will still have local replication
> configuration files, then I think we should just add any necessary info
> to those files and drop this entire conversation. We're expending a
> tremendous amount of energy on something that won't make any real
> difference to the overall complexity of configuring a replication setup.
> AFAICS the only way you make a significant advance in usability is if
> you can centralize all the configuration information in some fashion.
+1, but for real usability you have to make it so that this central
setup can be edited from any member of the replication.
HINT: plproxy.
Regards,
--
dim