Re: Extensions, patch v16

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dimitri Fontaine
Тема Re: Extensions, patch v16
Дата
Msg-id m2lj3xbpg7.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Extensions, patch v16  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Extensions, patch v16  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Are there any actual remaining use-cases for that sed step?

The goal here is to allow extension authors to maintain their version
number in the Makefile rather than in the Makefile and in the control
file separately. Having the same version number in more than one place
never eases maintenance.

Oh and in PostgreSQL sources cases, that would add like 36 spots where
to manually maintain our major version string. I'm not eager to do that.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extensions, patch v16
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb failure with Postgres 8.4.4