Re: Extensions, patch v16
| От | Dimitri Fontaine |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Extensions, patch v16 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m2lj3xbpg7.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Extensions, patch v16 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Extensions, patch v16
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Are there any actual remaining use-cases for that sed step? The goal here is to allow extension authors to maintain their version number in the Makefile rather than in the Makefile and in the control file separately. Having the same version number in more than one place never eases maintenance. Oh and in PostgreSQL sources cases, that would add like 36 spots where to manually maintain our major version string. I'm not eager to do that. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: