Re: Extensions, patch v16

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Extensions, patch v16
Дата
Msg-id 24239.1291998267@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Extensions, patch v16  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Ответы Re: Extensions, patch v16  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Re: Extensions, patch v16  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Are there any actual remaining use-cases for that sed step?

> The goal here is to allow extension authors to maintain their version
> number in the Makefile rather than in the Makefile and in the control
> file separately. Having the same version number in more than one place
> never eases maintenance.

Why is it in the makefile at all?  If the makefile does need to know it,
why don't we have it scrape the number out of the control file?  Or even
more to the point, since when do we need version numbers in extensions?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb failure with Postgres 8.4.4
Следующее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extensions, patch v16