Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dimitri Fontaine
Тема Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions
Дата
Msg-id m2k3ncp874.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> I'm not against this idea- but we *still* need to solve the problem of
> how we update the catalog during a point release and, imv anyway, we
> would need to be able to upgrade any in-core installed-by-default
> extensions during a point release too, to address any security or other

In case it wasn't clear, I agree with your view here and consider the
capability to auto-upgrade extensions a must have. What I say is that if
you ship the .so part of an extension in a live system, the next backend
that starts will use that code, without a restart.

That does not allow us not to provide a way to force-reload modules
currently used in live backends, and we still need to be able to upgrade
the system catalogs and "extension catalogs" too, either at startup in
live operations.

Separating away some code and SQL into in-core installed-by-default
extensions means we have new problems and abilities, not that some
problem are solved by themselves.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 9.3 release notes suggestions
Следующее
От: Vincenzo Melandri
Дата:
Сообщение: about index inheritance