Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions
Дата
Msg-id 20130506124538.GD4361@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Ответы Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions
Список pgsql-hackers
* Dimitri Fontaine (dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr) wrote:
> Another advantage of using more the extension infrastructure is that
> shipping bug fixes in the C or SQL parts of them would allow a hot fix
> to be shipped without restart when limited to an extension.

I'm actually not thrilled with the security update situation when it
comes to extensions.  It really is a disservice to our users to ask them
to independently manage each and every extension and upgrade each one of
them by hand.

> In-core installed-by-default extensions, anyone?

I'm not against this idea- but we *still* need to solve the problem of
how we update the catalog during a point release and, imv anyway, we
would need to be able to upgrade any in-core installed-by-default
extensions during a point release too, to address any security or other
issues from them.  Right now we get to slide by on upgrading extensions
by not having any in-core / installed-by-default ones and punting to the
user with "well, you installed it, not us, therefore you have to manage
it by hand for eternity"; that doesn't work when we're installing it for
them and they may not even know they've got it..
Thanks,
    Stephen

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions