Re: Image storage questions
| От | Douglas McNaught |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Image storage questions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m2d5rmrd9y.fsf@Douglas-McNaughts-Powerbook.local обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Image storage questions ("Guy Rouillier" <guyr@masergy.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
"Guy Rouillier" <guyr@masergy.com> writes: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> External storing is useful but I prefer LO because all my data (binary >> and meta) is all in the same place for management. > > But if that's a big L in LO, performance and maintenance will be > negatively affected, perhaps significantly. The DBMS will have to scan > over all that large binary data to extract text or numeric data. And > backups will copy that static binary data repeatedly. For those > reasons, if I'm storing very large objects, like images, that I know > I'll never search or update, I prefer to manage them externally. Large objects (and reasonably large text/bytea columns as well) are stored out-of-line, so normal table scans don't have to read them unnecessarily. -Doug
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: