"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>
>>>lo: another special data type. Is its functionality required
>>>anymore? It appears to be a workaround to some limitations of
>>>our large object interface which may no longer exist.
>
> I **think** the lo datatype is for ODBC binary access.
Yes, ISTR needing to install it to use ODBC BLOBs. I wonder if it
should be packaged with the ODBC driver instead of being in contrib/?
-Doug