Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> That is simply a horrid idea.  Just make it specify EXTENSION.

And VERSION too, finally.

So any extension 

>
>> and guessing
>> the CONTROL file name from the EXTENSION name only occurs when CONTROL
>> has not been provided.
>
> Here, on the other hand, I'm wondering why have two variables at all.
> Is there any sane use-case for the control file to not be named the same
> as the extension?  It seems like that would accomplish little except to
> sow confusion.
>
>             regards, tom lane

-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support