Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k
Дата
Msg-id m0zWR3e-0000emC@druid.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k
Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k
Список pgsql-hackers
Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> I have added a mention to the FAQ on the web site, saying the we are Y2K
> compliant.


Er, is that such a good idea?  I might stick my neck out if I am being paid
for it but I don't know that I would want lawyers arguing over exactly
what constitutes "Y2K compliant."  Sure, we are but that won't stop
ambulance ch^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hlawyers from causing us grief.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Дата:
Сообщение: Bug? relpages, reltuples resets to zero
Следующее
От: Dragana Obradovic
Дата:
Сообщение: ...