Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k
| От | darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m0zWR3e-0000emC@druid.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k
Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> I have added a mention to the FAQ on the web site, saying the we are Y2K
> compliant.
Er, is that such a good idea? I might stick my neck out if I am being paid
for it but I don't know that I would want lawyers arguing over exactly
what constitutes "Y2K compliant." Sure, we are but that won't stop
ambulance ch^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hlawyers from causing us grief.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: