Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success)
| От | jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | m0zRZQi-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success) ("Justin Hickey" <jhickey@impact1.hpcc.nectec.or.th>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] version functions (was NT port of PGSQL - success)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jazzman wrote:
>
> Hello Bruce
>
> On Oct 8, 5:40pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have removed the data/base/*/pg_version file because it was never
> > used. We had removed the 'version' functions long ago, but
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Does this mean that the following from the FAQ is wrong?
>
> 3.25) How do I tell what PostgreSQL version I am running?
>
> From psql, type select version();
>
> If so then this question should probably be changed to point users to the
> PG_VERSION file.
No, it is still correct. The version function is there and it
returns the compiled in string from version.h.
But take a look at version.c please. I think it should use
memcpy() or strncpy() instead of strcpy(). As it is now it
writes the null byte after the palloc'ed area.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: