Re: Inconsistency in vacuum behavior

Nikita Malakhov писал 2023-01-16 20:12:
> Hi,
> 
> Currently there is no error in this case, so additional thrown error
> would require a new test.
> Besides, throwing an error here does not make sense - it is just a
> check for a vacuum
> permission, I think the right way is to just skip a relation that is
> not suitable for vacuum.
> Any thoughts or objections?
> 

No objections for not throwing an error.

-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
Postgres Professional