Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES

On 5/18/20 7:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-May-18, Vik Fearing wrote:
> 
>> The syntax for FETCH FIRST allows the <fetch first quantity> to be
>> absent (implying 1).
>>
>> We implement this correctly for ONLY, but WITH TIES didn't get the memo.
> 
> Oops, yes.  I added a test.  Will get this pushed immediately after I
> see beta1 produced.

Thanks!
-- 
Vik Fearing