On 06.12.21 22:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> A minimal amount of maintenance would be "only back-patch fixes
> for issues that cause failure-to-build". The next step up is "fix
> issues that cause failure-to-pass-regression-tests", and then above
> that is "fix developer-facing annoyances, such as compiler warnings
> or unwanted test output, as long as you aren't changing user-facing
> behavior". I now think that it'd be reasonable to include this
> last group, although I'm pretty sure Peter didn't have that in mind
> in his policy sketch.
I would be okay with that.