On 10/26/2016 12:18 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com
>
> While your conclusion about rows/widths may
>
> be accurate I'm missing something if you are correct in stating the above.
>
> Each TOAST table has an associated OID but within that table every VALUE
> (which could mean multiple per record) has an OID and a Sequence Number
> which combined comprise a PK. Natalie's line of thinking seems to have
> some merit even if I don't know how to answer the question at hand.
Oh that's interesting. I think you are right. That said, the way forward
I think is still to partition that out and possibly break up the table.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.