Re: Define jsonpath functions as stable

On 9/17/19 10:00 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 09/17/19 21:13, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>
>> to), which describes being able to use "&#[0-9]+;" and "&#[0-9a-fA-F]+;"
>
> Er, that is, "&#[0-9]+;" and "&#x[0-9a-fA-F]+;" (with x for the hex case).

Correct, I missed the "x".

Thanks,

Jonathan