Re: More efficient pg_restore method?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ron
Тема Re: More efficient pg_restore method?
Дата
Msg-id ee4c5ab8-f86e-c101-5533-3dc946f794f5@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на More efficient pg_restore method?  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-admin
On 08/28/2018 11:48 AM, Ron wrote:
>
> Pg 9.6.9 on Linux...
>
> Given a backup server storing a "format=directory" database backup, and a 
> database server, should I:
>
> Option #1: run pg_restore on the backup server and "push" the data to the 
> database server via port 5432, or
> Option #2: have the backup server serve the dump directory via NFS, and 
> run pg_restore on the database server, pulling the data via nfs protocol?
>
> (It'll be a multi-threaded restore over a 10Gb pipe.)

Turns out that pushing the data over port 5432 is about 3x faster than 
pulling it across nfs (at least when a WAN is involved).

-- 
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.


В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bear Giles
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: FW: Setting up SSL for postgre
Следующее
От: David Rydzewski
Дата:
Сообщение: Archive to secondary Postgres instance