On 11/7/18 9:11 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
> On 11/7/18 2:47 PM, John Naylor wrote:
>> On 11/7/18, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> While looking at [1] (included in 23315.log) there are other warnings as
>>> well.
>> Perhaps it's worth revisiting to make debugging easier, but right now
>> initdb.c has this comment:
>>
>> * Note:
>> * The program has some memory leakage - it isn't worth cleaning it up.
>>
> Maybe. I certainly don't think it's not worth the time merely for the
> sake of fixing the memory leaks. The reasoning here is that initdb runs
> for a short period of time (a couple of seconds, really), and the memory
> gets released when the process exits. And the leaks are tiny in general
> - a couple of bytes here and there. Had there been a massive memory leak
> that would change the equation of course.
>
Yeah, I'm pretty sure I wrote that comment 15 or so years ago in the
first C implementation of initdb. I don't think my opinion has changed
much. We're talking about kilobytes, here, nothing massive.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services