Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs
Дата
Msg-id e8fdcee5-bfef-7707-a704-35bac35e5a11@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 2020-05-19 09:09, Michael Paquier wrote:
> While digging into my backlog, I have found this message from Peter E
> mentioning about $subject:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e6aac026-174c-9952-689f-6bee76f9ab68@2ndquadrant.com
> 
> It seems to me that it would be a good idea to make those checks more
> consistent, and attached is a patch.

That thread didn't resolve why check_canonical_path() is necessary 
there.  Maybe the existing uses could be removed?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Optimizer docs typos
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions