Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Дата
Msg-id e5c3cbd3-1551-d6f8-c9e2-51777d632fd2@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2017/04/12 2:41, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
>>> 2. DefineQueryRewrite() may try to scan a partitioned table in the case of
>>> converting a table to view, where we must make sure that the table being
>>> converted is empty.  It's checked by scanning the heap, which we should
>>> not do for a partitioned table.  Nor should we try to drop the storage
>>> once ready to make the table into a REKIND_VIEW relation (because all
>>> other checks passed okaying the conversion).
>>
>> It looks like this patch intends to allow converting a partitioned table
>> to a view.  I would lobby for refusing the command, instead.  There is
>> no good reason to allow it, and it might well be a user error.
> 
> Yeah, I agree.

Alright.  So I made it into two patches instead: 0001 fixes the bug that
validateCheckConstraint() tries to scan partitioned tables and 0002 makes
trying to convert a partitioned table to a view a user error.

Thanks,
Amit

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] error handling in RegisterBackgroundWorker
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade