Re: [HACKERS] error handling in RegisterBackgroundWorker

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Noah Misch
Тема Re: [HACKERS] error handling in RegisterBackgroundWorker
Дата
Msg-id 20170412021302.GA2890773@tornado.leadboat.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] error handling in RegisterBackgroundWorker  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] error handling in RegisterBackgroundWorker
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:33:34AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I think there is no clear agreement here, and no historically consistent
> > behavior.  I'm prepared to let it go and cross it off the list of open
> > items.  I believe we should keep thinking about it, but it's not
> > something that has to hold up beta.
> 
> Agreed, this doesn't seem like a must-fix-for-beta consideration.

Definitely not a beta blocker, agreed.  Would it be okay to release v10 final
with the logical replication launcher soft-failing this way?



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Remove pg_stat_progress_vacuum from Table 28.2
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode