On 2018/11/09 14:04, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/11/09 4:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I included the test case for collations to the three branches, but no
>> code changes. We can patch master for the handling of collations per
>> your patch,
>
> Okay, but should we back-patch it by adding WARNING to back-branches as
> you suggest?
I was looking at the pending patches that I'd sent and noticed this one to
throw an error when a partition specifies a collation for a column that
doesn't match the parent's. Do we want to apply the attached rebased
patch to HEAD and leave the back-branches (10 and 11) alone?
Thanks,
Amit