Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Дата
Msg-id dcc563d10904121658v65d9b4b1h2b0dfb79901afbfa@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production  ("Rainer Mager" <rainer@vanten.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Rainer Mager <rainer@vanten.com> wrote:
> We're running 8.3, but when we started this server about 2 years ago it was
> an earlier 8.x, I don't remember which.

Cool.  PostgreSQL is one of the few projects where I've always
recommended upgrading and keeping on the latest major version as soon
as possible after it comes out.  This stands in stark contrast to
apache 2.0, which was out for over two years before it was worth the
effort to migrate to.  The improvements just weren't worth the effort
to upgrade.  I've seen enough performance and capability in each major
version of pgsql to make it worth the upgrade since 7.0 came out.  I
think we've skipped one or two short releases,  like 7.1 or 8.2, but
in general even those represented useful gains over previous versions.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Rainer Mager"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production
Следующее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL