Re: Do we need vacuuming when tables are regularly dropped?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: Do we need vacuuming when tables are regularly dropped?
Дата
Msg-id dcc563d10809291026h6d01e20cv1afcffd8aec332c5@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we need vacuuming when tables are regularly dropped?  (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>)
Ответы Re: Do we need vacuuming when tables are regularly dropped?
Список pgsql-admin
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Steve Crawford
<scrawford@pinpointresearch.com> wrote:
>
>>> What it sounds like to me is that you're not vacuuming the system
>>> catalogs, which are getting bloated with dead rows about all those
>>> dropped tables.
>>>
>>
>> Wow, great!
>>
>> It is not immediately clear from the documentation, but the VACUUM
>> command also deals with the system catalogs as well, correct?
>>
>>
>
> To expand on Tom's answer, rows in system tables are created not only for
> tables but for each column in the table, rules, indexes, etc. You  can end
> up with a lot more row creation than you suspect. And temporary tables bloat
> the system tables just like regular tables. We discovered that cron scripts
> using temporary tables can cause very rapid system-table blotage.

Also, there was a time when you couldn't do vacuum full on system
tables do to locking issues, and had to take the db down to single
user mode to do so.

Tom, is that still the case?

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Steve Crawford
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we need vacuuming when tables are regularly dropped?
Следующее
От: Ing. Jorge S Alanís Garza
Дата:
Сообщение: PID file