[HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid
Дата
Msg-id db6cc923-e2d8-7fff-cc84-9bb084d1e757@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
pg_get_object_address() currently returns a field called subobjid, while 
pg_depend calls that objsubid. I'm guessing that wasn't on purpose 
(especially because internally the function uses objsubid), and it'd be 
nice to fix it.

Attached does that, as well as updating the input naming on the other 
functions for consistency. I stopped short of changing the instances of 
subobjid in the C code to reduce backpatch issues, but maybe that should 
be done too...
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Следующее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy