Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid
Дата
Msg-id 6b03029d-16ab-64d6-f8b5-9a75059fd404@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2/22/17 19:35, Jim Nasby wrote:
> pg_get_object_address() currently returns a field called subobjid, while 
> pg_depend calls that objsubid. I'm guessing that wasn't on purpose 
> (especially because internally the function uses objsubid), and it'd be 
> nice to fix it.

I'm in favor of changing it, but it could theoretically break someone's
code.  I don't know what the practical use for these functions is.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Soref
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Possible spelling fixes
Следующее
От: Aleksander Alekseev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning