"Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com> writes
>
> Wasn't the plan to rewrite pg_autovacuum to use the FSM rather than the
> stats collector?
>
I don't understand. Currently the basic logic of pg_autovacuum is to use the
pg_stat_all_tables numbers like n_tup_upd, n_tup_del to determine if a
relation need to be vacuumed. How to use FSM to get these information?
Regards,
Qingqing