Re: Using postgresql.org account as an auth id on third partywebsites
От | Stefan Kaltenbrunner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using postgresql.org account as an auth id on third partywebsites |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d7f4508f-7662-f686-d701-37d6382a48bf@kaltenbrunner.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using postgresql.org account as an auth id on third partywebsites (Álvaro Hernández <aht@ongres.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On 9/23/19 6:09 PM, Álvaro Hernández wrote: > > > On 23/9/19 9:28, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >> On 9/23/19 2:20 PM, Álvaro Hernández wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 23/9/19 10:26, Dave Page wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 10:45 PM Álvaro Hernández <aht@ongres.com >>>> <mailto:aht@ongres.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 21/9/19 12:32, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >>>> > On 9/20/19 3:14 AM, Álvaro Hernández wrote: >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > [...] >>>> > >>>> >>> Oh, and as a general rule, "requesting" unpaid volunteers to >>>> do work >>>> >>> for you for free is in general not a great way to get them >>>> >>> enthusiastic about helping out. >>>> >> Did I do so? I don't recall where or when I said that. >>>> >> >>>> >> Irrespective of this: what you say I read as: >>>> >> >>>> >> - Either volunteers, due to being unpaid, are not doing their >>>> job >>>> >> correctly (completely); >>>> > tbh as one of those volunteers, I kinda find it pretty >>>> irritating that >>>> > that the very first time somebody asks for community auth being >>>> opened >>>> > to non-pginfra managed sites an association of "us" not doing >>>> our job >>>> > correctly comes up just because that feature does not (and/or >>>> is not >>>> > implemented in the way you want it) do like. >>>> >>>> TBQH, I'm having a really hard time to understand how this >>>> conclusion could be derived from my words. >>>> >>>> >>>> It's exactly what I've inferred from your emails, and clearly I'm >>>> not alone :-( >>> >>> In between this sentence you are replying to, and the next one, >>> there was this one which you removed from your response: >>> >>> "For the avoidance of doubt: Stefan, and any other pg-infra volunteer >>> or anyone else how felt bad about my words: my deepest and most >>> sincere apology. I never, under any circumstance, intended to do any >>> negative statement about the job done or the team itself. I have a >>> great deal of respect to any kind of volunteering in general, let >>> alone for the one on helping on the technology that I love. I have >>> volunteered tons of work on Postgres myself, and I cannot otherwise >>> that feel in the same page. pg-infra: I know the work that you do and >>> have done, and I really appreciate it, specially given how small team >>> you are." >>> >>> The fact that you are still replying to the above sentence with >>> the paragraph that follows removed, means that either: >>> >>> * you didn't read it (in which case, please do); >> >> have you ever considered that dave just wanted to express that he had >> similiar feelings to what I had - simply claiming he didn't read your >> apology seems like a weird interpretation... > > Have you ever considered accepting, or even thanking, my apologies? > > Or at least, tell me if they are not enough for you. The appology is for sure enough and I do accept it - thanks for saying that! regards Stefan
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: