Re: Which gives good performance? separate database vs separate schema

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От tv@fuzzy.cz
Тема Re: Which gives good performance? separate database vs separate schema
Дата
Msg-id d0ba0839bcf4b41b456ec741f705e9bb.squirrel@sq.gransy.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Which gives good performance? separate database vs separate schema  (Divakar Singh <dpsmails@yahoo.com>)
Ответы Re: Which gives good performance? separate database vs separate schema  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-performance
Hello,

> Now, should I put these tables in 1 Database's different schemas or in
> separate
> databases itself for good performance?
> I am using libpq for connection.
>
> Pictorial Representation:
>
> Process1 -> DB1.schema1.table1
>
> Process2 -> DB1.schema2.table1
>
>   Vs.
>
> Process1 -> DB1.default.table1
>
> Process2 -> DB2.default.table1
>
> Which one is better?

Well, that depends on what you mean by "database." In many other products
each database is completely separate (with it's own cache, processes etc).
In PostgreSQL, there's a cluster of databases, and all of them share the
same cache (shared buffers) etc.

I don't think you'll get performance improvement from running two
PostgreSQL clusters (one for DB1, one for DB2). And when running two
databases within the same cluster, there's no measurable performance
difference AFAIK.

So the two options are exactly the same.

Tomas


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Divakar Singh
Дата:
Сообщение: Which gives good performance? separate database vs separate schema
Следующее
От: Thomas Kellerer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Which gives good performance? separate database vs separate schema