От: Francisco Reyes
Тема: Re: 3ware vs Areca
Дата: ,
Msg-id: cone.1216431595.291323.79328.1000@zoraida.natserv.net
(см: обсуждение, исходный текст)
Ответ на: 3ware vs Areca  (Jeff)
Список: pgsql-performance

Скрыть дерево обсуждения

3ware vs Areca  (Jeff, )
 Re: 3ware vs Areca  ("Scott Marlowe", )
 Re: 3ware vs Areca  (Luke Lonergan, )
  Re: 3ware vs Areca  ("Scott Marlowe", )
 Re: 3ware vs Areca  (Greg Smith, )
  Re: 3ware vs Areca  ("Jeffrey Baker", )
   Re: 3ware vs Areca  (Jeff, )
   Re: 3ware vs Areca  (Greg Smith, )
    Re: 3ware vs Areca  ("Jeffrey Baker", )
  Re: 3ware vs Areca  (Jeff, )
   Re: 3ware vs Areca  (Greg Smith, )
 Re: 3ware vs Areca  (Greg Smith, )
  Re: 3ware vs Areca  ("Jeffrey Baker", )
   Re: 3ware vs Areca  (Greg Smith, )
 Re: 3ware vs Areca  (Francisco Reyes, )

Jeffrey Baker writes:

> Their firmware is, frankly, garbage.  In more than one instance we
> have had the card panic when a disk fails, which is obviously counter
> to the entire purpose of a RAID.

I have had simmilar problems with 3ware 9550 and 9650 cards.
Undre FreeBSD I have seen constant crashes under heavy loads.
Used to think it was just FreeBSD, but saw a thread on StorageReview where
the same was happening under Linux.

> controllers from our database server and replaced them with HP P800s.

How is that working out?
Which RAID level? SAS/SATA?


В списке pgsql-performance по дате сообщения:

От: Francisco Reyes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: An "obvious" index not being used
От: Stephane Bailliez
Дата:
Сообщение: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench)