Re: Killing Processes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas F.O'Connell
Тема Re: Killing Processes
Дата
Msg-id cbf589c2fd04e34b3b01281c64a0d6fa@sitening.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Killing Processes  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
Список pgsql-admin
Oops. That's right. I was relying on memory, which is less reliable
than man. Fortunately, I always consult man before killing... :P

-tfo

--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Co-Founder, Information Architect
Sitening, LLC

Strategic Open Source: Open Your i™

http://www.sitening.com/
110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6
Nashville, TN 37203-6320
615-260-0005

On Apr 23, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Michael Fuhr wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 10:58:46AM -0500, Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
>>
>> It is generally not recommended that you kill processes with anything
>> stronger than HUP, which is (I believe) what kill sends by default.
>
> kill usually sends TERM by default, not HUP.
>
> (I say "usually" only because I haven't personally examined every
> implementation of kill in existence.  Every one I've used sends
> TERM by default and I haven't heard of any that work otherwise.)

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Fuhr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Killing Processes
Следующее
От: Christopher Browne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Killing Processes