Re: Maximum Possible Insert Performance?
| От | William Yu |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Maximum Possible Insert Performance? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | bptg3i$64u$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Maximum Possible Insert Performance? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Maximum Possible Insert Performance?
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Josh Berkus wrote: > William, > > >>When my current job batch is done, I'll save a copy of the dir and give >>the WAL on ramdrive a test. And perhaps even buy a Sandisk at the local >>store and run that through the hooper. > > > We'll be interested in the results. The Sandisk won't be much of a > performance test; last I checked, their access speed was about 1/2 that of a > fast SCSI drive. But it could be a feasability test for the more expensive > RAMdrive approach. > The SanDisks do seem a bit pokey at 16MBps. On the otherhand, you could get 4 of these suckers, put them in a mega-RAID-0 stripe for 64MBps. You shouldn't need to do mirroring with a solid state drive. Time to Google up some more solid state drive vendors.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: