On 2017-11-29 18:50, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
<snip>
> My last point was for “If we do continue to link to the International
> sites, we should have guidelines on what content they should contain”
> similar to some other guidelines. It seems like the PostgreSQL.fr
> <http://postgresql.fr/> and some of the other actively maintained ones
> could serve as a model for setting up those guidelines. Once those
> guidelines are published, we can give the international sites a grace
> period to follow the guidelines and also have a proper evaluation
> process for bringing new sites into the fold.
Hmmm, this kind of sounds like us wanting to be control freakish about
stuff.
It doesn't hurt for us to have basic sanity checks (eg is the site
still online?, actively updated?, fairly accurate?).
But be careful of the desire to impose strict *requirements* much past
that. Guidelines might be ok, but hard requirements (with no
flexibility)
might be more harmful/issue-causing than otherwise.
That being said... that's just a general concept. :)
+ Justin
> Best,
>
> Jonathan