On 10/3/23 17:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> writes:
>> On 10/2/23 20:07, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>>> FWIW I'm +1 on this patch,
>
>> Thanks.
>
>>> and with Tom on dropping the "yet". To me it
>>> makes it sound like we intend to implement it soon (fsvo).
>
>> I am not fundamentally opposed to it, nor to any other wordsmithing the
>> committer (probably Tom) wants to do. The main point of the patch is to
>> list at least some of the problems that need to be solved in a correct
>> implementation.
>
> Pushed with a bit more work on the text.
>
> I left out the regression test, as it seems like it'd add test cycles
> to little purpose. It won't do anything to improve the odds that
> someone finds this text.
Thanks!
--
Vik Fearing