On 30.08.23 02:51, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 10:51:10AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> At a glance, however, I think my patch is (a) not related, and (b) if it
>> were, it would probably *help*, because the change is to not allocate any
>> long-lived structures that no one needs and that might get out of date.
>
> Hmm, yeah, perhaps you're right about (b) here. I have a few other
> high-priority items for stable branches on my board before being able
> to look at all this in more details, unfortunately, so feel free to
> ignore me if you think that this is an improvement anyway even
> regarding the other issue discussed.
I have committed this.