On 11/18/18 12:47 AM, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> This patch went through last few commitfests without any activity, but cfbot
> says it still applies and doesn't break any tests. From what I see there was
> some agreement about naming, so the patch is indeed needs more review. Could
> anyone from the reviewers (Vik?) confirm that it's in a good shape?
Thanks Dmitry to bringing this up.
For me, the question is how to name this GUC?
Is "log_sample_rate" is enough? I am not sure because it is only related to
queries logged by log_min_duration_statements.
Alors, I wonder if we should use the same logic for other parameters, such as
log_statement_stats
log_parser_stats
log_planner_stats
log_executor_stats
It was mentioned in this thread
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180710183828.GB3890%40telsasoft.com