> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 at 23:07, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 07/16/2018 05:24 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Vik Fearing
> > <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >> Hmm. Not sure if that last word should be _sample, _sampling, _rate, or
> >> a combination of those.
> >
> > +1 for rate or sample_rate. I think "sample" or "sampling" without
> > "rate" will not be very clear.
> >
>
> 1+ to sample_rate
>
> It's what auto_explain and pgbench uses, so let's keep the naming
> consistent.
This patch went through last few commitfests without any activity, but cfbot
says it still applies and doesn't break any tests. From what I see there was
some agreement about naming, so the patch is indeed needs more review. Could
anyone from the reviewers (Vik?) confirm that it's in a good shape?