Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?
Дата
Msg-id b970888f-ec57-b93d-7ce2-e8fe8ac2a11b@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 4/20/17 22:24, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 02:09:54PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I think we're not really sure yet what to do about this.  Discussion is
>> ongoing.  I'll report back on Wednesday.
> 
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update, and this is
> overall the seventh time you have you allowed one of your open items to go out
> of compliance.  Kindly start complying with the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

We are actively working on it.  It should be resolved within a few days.Next check-in Monday.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?
Следующее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?