Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Noah Misch
Тема Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?
Дата
Msg-id 20170421022412.GA184144@rfd.leadboat.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 02:09:54PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think we're not really sure yet what to do about this.  Discussion is
> ongoing.  I'll report back on Wednesday.

This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update, and this is
overall the seventh time you have you allowed one of your open items to go out
of compliance.  Kindly start complying with the policy on open item ownership:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

At a bare minimum, send a status update within 24 hours, and include a date
for your subsequent status update.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] walsender & parallelism
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] walsender & parallelism