Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string()
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b847bc16-57b4-4701-870b-c4ed33d71e51@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string() ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string()
Re: Document DateStyle effect on jsonpath string() |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Isn't this behavior actually a bug that should be fixed rather than documented? These JSON path functions are specified by the SQL standard, so they shouldn't depend on PostgreSQL-specific settings. At least in new functionality we should avoid that, no? On 10.09.24 21:43, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Sep 10, 2024, at 14:51, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Pushed with a little additional polishing. > > Thank you! Do you think it’d be worthwhile to back port to 17? > >> I thought the best way to address jian's complaint about DateStyle not >> being clearly locked down was to change horology.sql to verify the >> prevailing setting, as it has long done for TimeZone. That's the >> lead test script for related stuff, so it makes the most sense to >> do it there. Having done that, I don't feel a need to duplicate >> that elsewhere. > > Yeah, that will help, but I still bet next time I go to figure out what it is I’ll stick that line in some test to makeit fail with clear output for what it’s set to 😂.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: