On 10/19/2017 11:25 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Andrew Dunstan
> <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/18/2017 10:07 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Please see the attached patch which considers all the discussion done,
>>> which shapes the code in the way I see most suited for HEAD and
>>> back-branches.
>>
>> Patch doesn't apply against HEAD.
>>
>> Also, don't we need more tests?
> Oops. Sorry about that. v3 is incorrect, I messed up the origin commit
> for the diffs generated. Here you go as attached.
Looks good. Do you want to produce patches for the back branches also?
this applies to REL_10 but not earlier. If not I'll work on it this weekend.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs