On 03/06/17 11:10, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 02/06/17 22:29, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> On 02/06/17 08:55, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>>> On 02/06/17 17:11, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2017-06-02 00:46, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>>>>> On 31/05/17 21:16, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm seeing a new failure with the patch applied - this time the
>>>>> history table has missing rows. Petr, I'll put back your access :-)
>>>> Is this error during 1-minute runs?
>>>>
>>>> I'm asking because I've moved back to longer (1-hour) runs (no errors
>>>> so far), and I'd like to keep track of what the most 'vulnerable'
>>>> parameters are.
>>>>
>>> Yeah, still using your test config (with my minor modifications).
>>>
>>> When I got the error the 1st time, I did a complete make clean and
>>> rebuild....but it is still possible I've 'done it wrong' - so
>>> independent confirmation would be good!
>> Well, I've seen this issue as well while I was developing the fix, but
>> the patch I proposed fixed it for me as well as the original issue.
>>
> While I was testing something for different thread I noticed that I
> manage transactions incorrectly in this patch. Fixed here, I didn't test
> it much yet (it takes a while as you know :) ). Not sure if it's related
> to the issue you've seen though.
>
>
Ok - I've applied this version, and running tests again. I needed to do
a git pull to apply the patch, so getting some other changes too!
Cheers
Mark