Re: long transaction
| От | Merlin Moncure |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: long transaction |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | b42b73150808111203l14df2d2dicd4350f04d64e838@mail.gmail.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: long transaction ("Sabin Coanda" <sabin.coanda@deuromedia.ro>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Sabin Coanda <sabin.coanda@deuromedia.ro> wrote: > No, I cannot use VACUUM inside the transaction, and it seems this is the > problem, although autovacuum is set. > > However I checked the following scenario to find a solution. I call the > 30000 statements without transaction. The performance it not changed. But > when I add VACUUM command after each 20 statement set, I got the linear > performance that I want. Unfortunatelly this is not possible inside a > transaction. > > Do you know how could I solve my problem, keeping the 30000 statements > inside a single transaction ? long running transactions can be evil. is there a reason why this has to run in a single transaction? merlin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: