On 12/07/2008, Wright, George <George.Wright@infimatic.com> wrote:
>> Let's say it's not easy to just "read" the definition ... one can go
>> and use a disassembler to see what your procedure does if one
>> feels the urge (and is good with assembler). The question is also:
>> "whom do you want to stop from seeing them?"
> For intel. Prop. Reasons, I don't want the source for the functions to
> be visible. The functions I've written are plpgsql and if I do \df+
> <function> it displays the fully readable entire source.
Still didn't fully get who you're trying to hide stuff from, but
have a look at those two (not that old) threads which you
may find enlightening ....
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-12/msg00209.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-novice/2008-01/msg00111.php
Oh, and please take the time to familiarise yourself with the quoting
style on the postgres mailing-lists.
Cheers,
Andrej
--
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes concise.
http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm