Re: Wanted: new project slogan
От | Joshua Kramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wanted: new project slogan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.LFD.2.00.1002031253050.14239@home-av-server.home-av обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wanted: new project slogan (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wanted: new project slogan
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
>> Community-owned. It also has negative connotations in the corporate sphere. > > I think I don't like your friends. It would be interesting to do a survey of "suits" to see in what percentage of companies this is the case. I have spoken with upper management at more than one large company, all of whom said (though not in so many words) that the primary reason they (spend the tens-hundreds of K/year to) buy support is not because their own folks lack expertise, but because they want a "neck to strangle" (i.e. an entity on which to displace responsibility). Almost invariably, such management is allergic (i.e. has violent reactions to) the term 'community', and upon discovering the use of 'community' software in their enterprises start looking for a support contract to buy (i.e. CentOS -> RedHat, PostgreSQL -> EnterpriseDB) -OR- alternative supported products that they already license (i.e. PostgreSQL -> MS-SQL-Server). Lower-level workers who want to integrate open source products into their ecosystems have better luck when they suggest those supported alternatives. I wish I was just being silly with this dialogue, but this has been my experience with corporate IT. -JK
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: