Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?

>> The original stylesheets explicitly go out of their way to do it that
>> way.
>
> Can we find any evidence of the reasoning?  As you say, that clearly was
> an intentional choice.

Given the code, my guess would be the well-intentioned but misplaced 
desire to avoid a redundancy, i.e. two links side-by-side which point to 
the same place.

-- 
Fabien.